MFP-2000 LP v Viking Capital Limited [2014] SC (Bda) 6 Com
The Respondents, as holders of more than 95% of the shareholding of a company, had given notice to buy out the shares of the Applicant. Before the purchase took place, the Respondents were no longer the holders of more than 95%. The court was required to resolve the issue of whether this prevented the Respondents from enforcing the purchase.
Hellman J balanced the competing constructions and concluded the more commercially sensible construction was that the Respondents were not required to still hold more than 95% at the time of the purchase.
The Respondents, as holders of more than 95% of the shareholding of a company, had given notice to buy out the shares of the Applicant. Before the purchase took place, the Respondents were no longer the holders of more than 95%. The court was required to resolve the issue of whether this prevented the Respondents from enforcing the purchase.
Hellman J balanced the competing constructions and concluded the more commercially sensible construction was that the Respondents were not required to still hold more than 95% at the time of the purchase.
No comments:
Post a Comment